
I am from Pittsburgh and did not grow up with a professional basketball team. We non-four-sport-city residents are a dime a dozen. I speak for Milwaukee, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Seattle, etc. when I say we’re tired of being left out of conversations just because we don’t have teams in certain leagues. It’s time to rise up, citizens of Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Salt Lake City. Pick a hockey, basketball, and football team. Now is your chance, your one chance to pick a team and stick with them through the good times and the bad. We are lucky in that sense. I didn’t choose to root for the Pirates, but I’m stuck with ‘em. I won’t let it happen in the NBA.
The process of picking a team contains a lot of ins, a couple of outs, and a handful of what-have-yous. Teams cannot be too good or too bad. They have to be genuinely likable. It is one part art, one part science. It is a tremendous responsibility to be my team, a responsibility I trust my team will take seriously.
Behold, the list of requirements I built for NBA teams to qualify as my team. Godspeed, team of the future. Godspeed.
1. Teams cannot have a dominant recent past.
Now clearly, ‘dominant’ is a relative term and will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. However, it clearly refers to teams that have won their regular seasons conferences and/or appeared in the conference finals. The goal here is not to jump on any bandwagons. So, teams that went deep into the playoffs but ultimately failed will be given some consideration. Time is also a factor. If a team made the conference finals three years ago but has since slumped, I do not necessarily consider them dominant.
*Teams disqualified (7): The Lakers, Celtics, Cavaliers, Magic, Spurs, Pistons, Nuggets
2. Teams cannot have an embarrassing recent past.
I am not a masochist and will not align my allegiance with teams that cannot possibly win this year or next year. Teams that have had a winning percentage of less than .300 in either of the past two years are eliminated. As noted earlier, I am from Pittsburgh. I live with Pirates. I will not invite another loser – no matter how lovable – to the party.
*Teams disqualified (5): The Grizzlies, Clippers, Kings, Timberwolves, Thunder
Note 1: The Heat stay qualified because of their vast improvement from the 2007 season to the 2008 season.
Note 2: The Knicks stay qualified because they are going to inherit Lebron.
(Spoiler alert: both these teams will be eliminated soon.)
Note 3: I fought hard to keep the Thunder out of this category. Their young, dynamic, and have some voluptuous curves. Still, I stick by my rules and foresee another 2-3 years before they can truly compete in the West.

3. Teams cannot have an annoying fan base, owner, or star player.
I like my teams likable. As a fan, I am a free agent, and the emotional weather matters. New York/New Jersey teams are hard to root for. Likewise, cities that have enviably successful teams in other sports don’t need me as a fan. If the Celtics or Pistons were not eliminated earlier, for instance, they would be disqualified here; Boston and Detroit simply enjoy too much success in other sports. We need to spread the wealth. If a fan base of a team is notoriously obnoxious, I won’t be entirely eager to join their ranks. If the Celtics or Pistons were not eliminated earlier, for instance, they would be disqualified here.
*Teams disqualified (5): The Knicks, Nets, Mavericks, Heat, 76ers
4. Teams and cities that have been around for so long and continue to come up short.
At some point, it just becomes fun to watch these teams lose. These teams have superstars that carry their teams consistently. Still, they never seem to have all the pieces in place, no matter how close they get. I have watched these teams lose when I was sure they would win. And now, I can never trust them again.
*Teams disqualified (3): The Wizards, Rockets, Suns
5. Teams should have a premier player that is genuinely enjoyable to watch.
Some players do it for ya, some don’t. With apologies to several players averaging over 20 points/game or 10 rebounds/game, sometimes you’re still not fun to watch. It’s like playing with the Golden State Warriors in NBA JAM. Sure, they had Mullen and Hardaway, but when push came to shove, it was just more exciting to play with Kemp and Schrempf.
*Teams disqualified (6): The Bulls, Bobcats, Hawks, Bucks, Pacers, Warriors
Four teams remain. The Blazers, Raptors, Jazz, and Hornets. These teams are good but not great.
They have young, exciting players in Bosh, Williams, Paul, and Roy/Oden. Being picky – and I realize I am – the Blazers have the West Coast problem, the Raptors play in a big market (strike one) in Canada (strike two), and the Jazz still have yet to shed their Malone/Stockton identity in my mind (though why that is a bad thing, I can’t fully articulate).
With the Hornets, I see players I recognize. I see college ball players who haven’t altered – just improved – their game to play professionally. They can kick it old school with Peja and Mo Peterson. They can kick it new school with Okafor and Wright. They can even kick it middle school with David West. I see a smaller market team competing with the big boys at the top. I see a relatively new team with an even newer identity. I see pride. I see power. I see a bad-ass Hornet who don’t take no crap from nobody. They are primed to make a run.
New Orleans, welcome your newest fan. I’m loyal, good with kids, and have a college degree. Please don’t let me down. Big game against the Mavs tomorrow night; beat them good and let the climb to the top begin.



6
Raimy,
I think you made a solid choice with the Hornets. But as a T-Wolves fan i am a little offended that you eliminated them so early. This would have been a great chance to jump on board before Ricky Rubio comes over (if that ever happens). You would have looked like a profit.
P.S. the first picture just made me remember Detlef Schrempf. Thank you for that. I miss that guy…
Great post, but why the hell are you writing for another sports blog.
There is only one sports blog worthy of your posts, thats right http://www.luolsdong.blogspot.com.
I will excuse this little foray with another blog just dont let it happen again.
I love the ideas behind this post. I was fortunate enough to live in a 4-sport city but have many freinds who have not.
This is a much better approach than Houstonians have, which is simply to despise hockey for no good reason.
1) Can’t see why the Heat have been disqualified at #3. I’m possibly biased in assuming that Dwayne Wade & Pat Riley aren’t un-likable.
I will assume that we get sacked for an “annoying” fanbase, which isn’t as annoying as it is fair-weather, and may have a tendency to show up late to games (ala Dodgers/Lakers fans) . . . but, there’s alot going on in Miami, and I still don’t see enough demerit to disqualify under this category.
Also, the Heat are one of very few teams with room under the cap to sign *2* free agents next summer to max contracts . . . Wade + Lebron anyone?
Hop on the wagon now before it’s too late. Chalmers & Beasley have already contributed to this season’s early success.
2) I would disqualify the Hawks under #4 rather than #5. They have been woeful for all I can remember, and I don’t know if they’ve ever made a conf. finals. I also find that Josh Smith is “premier” enough and enjoyable to watch.
3) Of your remaining options I see the Blazers as the obvious choice. They’ve done what the Thunder and Timberwolves are attempting to do, raise and nourish young talent so that they all flourish together and will stay talented for a number of years. Except that the Blazers are ahead of the game.
Brandon Roy, Lamarcus Aldridge, and Greg Oden are all recognizable college guys. Andre Miller, Joel Pryzbilla, & Steve Blake are old school enough. And apparently they’re still paying & playing Juwan Howard . . .
They also have an extremely winnable division. Outside of Denver – OKC, Utah, and Minnesota are all teams they should pass.
So buy yourself a Clyde jersey and pretend you’ve been there all along.